I am reading plays for a particular competition myself at the moment and there are good plays, some very good plays, that will not win because they don’t meet the particular guidelines of the particular award. Difficult as that is, that’s the way it is.
The organisation/people/person hosting any award quite justly have their criteria and if a play doesn’t meet the criteria it usually doesn’t get onto the shortlist let alone win. Sad but valid fact.
But still, to go back to the Burton, I agree with Noelle J that this decision does seem a touch mean-spirited. I’m glad I didn’t have a submission in this year – I’d be feeling quite discouraged now! And can someone explain this piece of logic from the media release to me: “The fact that there will be no winner of the Award this year highlights the ongoing need to support emerging playwrights in Australia…”? So…by not supporting anyone we are highlighting the need to support, is that it?
And don’t get me started on the constant support for ’emerging’ artists thing. Tiresome.
]]>But there are 2 things that trouble me about Black Swan’s decision. A decision I find rather mean-spirited. Their press release says they will look at using the prize money to support ‘development’. When you win one of those prizes that comes with a cheque, the playwright gets the money and they can use it as they see fit. In this ‘development’ scenario, the theatre company will control how the money is spent. The other things that bothers me here is that our arts culture is increasingly a prize orientated whereby one winner is rewarded for the weeks and months spent creating a new work and any number of others are not. This is an increasingly important issue as the slow creep of prize culture replaces the steady development of new work across various fronts.
]]>