So, its good to read a review that’s engaging with the work on its own terms – trying to account for the work of this work – rather than just viewing it through the lens of other dominant theatrical conventions.
P.S. Diana Simmonds’ review was just a rant. In response to her rhetorical question ‘What did I ever do to deserve this?’ I want to say ‘Actually, its not all about you.’
]]>Some pieces can survive a weary reviewer’s reading – especially if it asks nothing of them.
This asks a lot – so I suggest audiences go with a full stomach, empty bladder, feeling relaxed.
Can’t wait to read you (as always, James) and see if we disagree or agree – and on what!
]]>