Comments on: Shit on your Blog? No I’d rather not. https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/ Thu, 14 Aug 2014 23:31:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.27 By: Katie Pollock https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13281 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:19:55 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13281 Sorry, I mean worth reading (need your typo police).

]]>
By: Katie Pollock https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13280 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:18:38 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13280 Thanks for this post Gus. I appreciate that your comments are always honest, despite the potential that you “may never be employed in theatre” because of them (which I certainly hope is not the case). This is what makes your site with reading. I’m not suggesting that other reviewers are not honest of course, simply that I know you don’t just roll with fashion or friendship out of fear or laziness. This is why you have so many friends.

]]>
By: Augusta Supple https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13271 Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:30:42 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13271 Yes indeed, blogs are wonderful like that Mark – that we can have a conversation, we can clarify, re-word (and sometimes re-think) our positions.
But I think that can only really, genuinely happen when the identity of the blogger is out there. Otherwise it’s like trying to have a meaningful conversation with a person in a cloak and a mask.
I am lucky because I have such amazing conversations with artists and critics and punters – not all conversations are easy, but all are respectful.
And that’s the tone I choose to prioritise and favour.

But it takes time and care to blog – it’s not like print whereby you write/it’s printed and then you’re done – it’s a living document – and will change with responses over time.

]]>
By: Mark Dessaix https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13270 Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:07:49 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13270 You’re welcome Gus,

But don’t take my love/hate too seriously, it’s the only saying i could find..and it’s more economical to write than “sometimes like/and sometimes not like” :) I don’t hate what they say at all. I think my “love” part comes from reading a sharp and insightful review, going to the play whether it’s been given a good or bad rap, and making up my own mind, a la Kate Revz. I remember seeing her posters for Orestes 2.0 with the different types of review blurbs and thinking “that’s a pretty damn smart move”. The “hate” part probably comes from not being able to discuss it with the critic if I agree or disagree. henceforth, enter the Blog!

I enjoy reading blog responses as they are readily available for discussion. And working with KJ at the moment has been very educational in that regard.

Anyway, whether they be a theatre critic/reviewer/blogger, it all goes in to making up the whole of our impressively diverse arts community. We can’t always be nice and like everything that’s out there, but we can encourage, like you say, through healthy and honest creative discussion.

]]>
By: Augusta Supple https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13267 Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:41:04 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13267 Thanks for writing Mark,
lovely to read your perspective, as always…

I suspect that you just might love critics – after all you have been produced by one (me) and you are currently being directed by one (Kevin Jackson). I suspect you just might hate what they say sometimes. And I think that is good because it might provoke a further thinking on why you don’t agree – and in doing so you may strengthen your own artistic conviction.

As far as critics impacting “the make or break” of the show – I don’t really think that’s true. In the case of one of Kate Revz’s show’s she used the wildly contrasting opinions of reviewers to spruik to the public/potenital punter “come make up your own mind.” I think the producer makes or breaks a show – as does the quality of the performances and the text.

My “reviews” are not often not for audiences’ “pre-show” reading, but often they are what I refer to as a “response” to encourage an audience’s “post-show” rumination.

Thank you for your encouragement – it is very appreciated. More than you might realise.

]]>
By: Mark Dessaix https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13261 Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:01:33 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13261 Gus, I have always had a bit of love/hate thing for critics…to a degree, that one persons opinion can have the potential to make or break a show. No matter how bad or good it is, that critic could have many reasons why they gave a thumbs up or down – creatively, artistically…or they could just be having a shit day at work like all of us do, and no matter what, they just can’t shake the shit day feeling. I never take a review personally. ever. I take a review creatively, constructively. It’s a response to my work, or work I am part of, and in the end that is one of the jobs artists and creatives are mean’t to do. elicit a response. What I love about blogging, is that it offers up so much more of an opinion in a much more vast and less obliging way. What’s the point of making art if no one talks about it, dissects it and discusses it? Keep it up…it’s good shit (pun intended).

]]>
By: Kate Foy https://classic.augustasupple.com/2012/02/shit-on-your-blog-no-id-rather-not/comment-page-1/#comment-13260 Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:47:15 +0000 https://classic.augustasupple.com/?p=3218#comment-13260 Good for you, Augusta! Keep on.

]]>