Love Me Tender| Company B and Griffin Theatre Company
- April 16th, 2010
- Posted in Reviews & Responses
- Write comment
In the dizzying haze of Stories from the 428- I didn’t get out much to other theatres- I spent alot of my time with a laptop on my lap top or gesticultating wildly at actors (and occasionally chasing them around rehearsal rooms)… and so was mildly shut off from my regular review circuit. During that time, however, one play was mentioned to me in passing by people who had access to “the outside world” as I remembered it- and that play was none other than Tom Holloway’s Love Me Tender.
I, of course wanted to see this play and I wanted to pay to see it too (recently a facebook friend discovered a rant/article first published on www.aussietheatre.com a few years back about the politics of comps and I still hold true to what I said then- PAY FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN!)- so had to wait for the bus to roll on before I could see why everyone was asking me if I’d seen it…
I will also declare that in 2008 (The first year of Brand Spanking New) I commissioned Tom to write (any thing of his chosing) and this was on the back of his AWGIE win… it was a play called ” If I Was to Stay I Would Only Be In Your Way” (it seems song lyrics are prevalent amongst Tom’s titles.) That being said I only met him for the first time last year at the launch of Griffin Theatre Company’s short play compilation: “Short Circuit.” So this is not a review this is a reflection on what I am left with post show. (I didn’t get one of the very schmick programmes with play concealed within- sadly- there were none on the night I went). I am not going to give an account of the story- you can get that from www.australianstage.com.au and if you are after the context of Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis- keep an eye on James Waites’s site for a review he’s the master and has a brilliant perspective on this production and he’ll be writing it up soon (so he told me over coffee). My blurt is really what I saw/now remember.
As a co-production between Company B and Griffin Theatre Company- which has a beautiful historical symmetry to it. Belvoir grew out of Nimrod – and here’s the Griffin is (now housed in the old Nimrod space) nurtured by Belvoir in the months leading up to the rennovation of the Stables. Like a set of visual babbushka dolls- I am reminded of the Stables theatre- the show fitting in the Belvoir St Theatre beautifully. There is a lovely symmetry at work spatially- a set made of astro-turf, encased in a perspex sheild- diamond shaped for the Belvoir space- but also reminiscent of the Stables space.
The play opens with rapid fire exposition- a description told with much urgency by Arky Michael and Kris McQuade. And there isn’t much room to ease up once the foot is on this verbal accelarator. We are asked to image/remember alot- too much? We are asked to sit there and ingest a barrage of ideas/commentary as McQuade and Michaels physicalise the visceral poetry of Holloway’s work in their functionary roles of the chorus. Sometimes I found it hard to keep up- hard to listen- and I think that is the point. Alot of this is about the all consuming nature of love- of lust- how images and thoughts and feelings push themselves into us consciously and unconsciously.
Simple and impressive, Lutton’s direction is cleanly/keenly delivered. The play space for the actors is sodden, misted and shiny- glittering under lights. The performances are tight and punchy. It looks like at Lutton show (thanks to Adam Gardnir)- and feels like its coated in STC slickness.
However- looking around the audience of theatre patrons- many were asleep. Drowsy grey haired patrons- sleepy. Was it the mist? Was it the lights? Was it the rapid fire delivery? Why weren’t they awake? Why did I feel sleepy? It felt dreamlike- soft- poetic- and again- I’ll take that as it’s intention. The sneaky, taboo thoughts that press themselves into us are subtle- there is no bolt out of the blue. This is a slow leak suggestion- as sexual suggestiveness can sometimes be- it smears itself across everything like vaseline over a camera lens- and we feel the clarity slip from our thoughts.
Then-
BASH! Like being woken by ice water- or the maniacal rattle of an early morning Marrickville jackhammer- the most astounding dance sequence I have seen in the theatre in recent times. Recognisable, raunchy, repulsive, embarrassing: completely perfect. As Belinda McGory writes and gyrates and pulses her gradually soaked body to teenpop obnoxiousness- I am left shaken- horrified and broken in my seat. The sleepy heads regained their posture now their nap had been broken.
The ideas are loud and clear- the sexualisation of children- the tragedy of intimacy- the burden of sacrifice… and I am trapped an unwilling audience watching the horror of what I know too well to be wildy true about the continual sexualisation of children- played out before me. I am glued. I’m not moved. I am stuck staring- gawking compulsively. Gawking. Powerless and gawking. One reviewer said that there was no connection to the audience. Perhaps- this is a telling (not a showing). The connection is more to do with the audience’s imagination than with the actors- moments of this play could have been a radio play- it is in us. That’s the point. That’s the problem. Holloway’s play asks us to listen and think and imagine- there is very little shown… and that is also the art of seduction. I got sucked in. I went there. I was horrified by what I found.
And grateful.
Gus,
you are putting me on the spot – but that’s okay – i do feel should rise to the occasion on Love Me Tender. And I will – do my best to do so. My site’s back up with an updated WordPress (quite different in my ways), am in the middle of relocating from a PC back to a Mac (at last – and many of its formats have changed since last time I was a Mac user), and still a few glitches on my site to be solved. So instead of writing, I keep having to stop to work stuff out. But getting there.
Think I might just cut and past that paragraph and put it up on my site – where right now I am trying to catch up on Big hART stuff – four projects I want to mention: two recently finished – and two new ones on the way.
To write about about Love Me Tender is quite a challenge – but it needs to be talked about – a very creative script and bold staging.
Hey Gus and James,
Thought I would add my 2 cents!
Have had a few interesting discussion about the play and thought I might chip in. It’s been quite interesting to see the way the play has divided audiences. I know there have been a lot of positive critical responses but I know a lot of people who saw the show and found it confusing/alienating/pretentious etc
I saw the show on the opening preview night which was quite some time ago and I think what Tom has done is a real achievement, full of a stark power and beauty. I remember V.S. Naipaul writing that all he wanted was for his books to echo and live on in the mind of the reader…
It’s been a few weeks since I saw the play but images, ideas and recollections of the richness of language are still with me.
I think what Tom is doing is quite clear – and at the same time open for us as an audience to leap into the fold and make of it what we will, consider his central image of the girl as a lamb/fawn/sacrifice/innocent…. and absent from the stage (form and meaning combining?)
I think Tom’s play really tussles with the idea/question of how a daughter can be sacrificed in a meaningful, rich and nuanced way. In the original text Iphigenia is literally replaced by a deer. (This myth/fable has some interesting parallels to the story of Isaac being sacrificed Abraham…) Why is the girl seen as a sacrifice? In what sense is the daughter a sacrifice?
That’s where we come in as the audience to engage and make what we will
I had a chat with Tom about the play and he wrote the following
“This question of the sacrifice is even more concentrated in terms of the ‘Agamemnon/father’ figure. He gets confused about his relationship with his daughter as well as how society sees it and instead of taking real responsibility he kills the lamb.
Or you could also say that in killing the lamb he stops seeing his daughter as pure innocence and starts to see her as a real person.”
So the act of killing the lamb becomes in some sense about the ‘Agamemnon/father’ character confronting the reality of a cruel world instead of avoiding it. We can see the slaughter of the lamb as destructive, or can see it an act of honesty (I use the word slaughter on purpose. I would suggest this is a a terrifying thought, but one which resonates long after we have left the theatre)
Or we can see the act of killing/sacrifice/slaughter as both these things: death and destruction but also cleansing and purifying…
For me that’s the beauty of the play, the control of dramatic form, language ‘character’ theme etc have allowed Matt to make a play that allows the audience ‘into’ the text in a way a play like Gethsemane (I decided to pick another Belvoir production I saw) does not… so that we can even add/disagree and discuss the play with the writer and draw from it in ways he did not intend.
However, while I understand how the idea of ‘sacrifice’ makes sense as a symbolic idea in a world where there is a tangible relationship between the divine and human in the world Tom has created in what sense is her death a sacrifice? I mean this in all seriousness. Tom’s world has removed the notion of the gods as actors in the lives of people – her death to me therefore seems to not be a sacrifice but a death in the face of the reality of life. The indifference of nature to suffering. This seems to me to be very different to the notion of sacrifice and therefore the symbolism of her as a fawn/lamb is mixed…
Does that make any sense????
A jumble of thoughts… But for me the crucial fact is that the play is still buzzing around in my little brain even if it buzzes around in a way that other people may find very bizarre…
Anyway, thought I would add to the discussion. Not sure if my thoughts went anywhere but I thought it was a pity to leave just two of you in this discussion!
Might go and post my ramblings below Kevin Jackson’s very interesting review!!!!